Map of Barrow County, Georgia, with Bethlehem highlighted in red. Map: Arkyan / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
A Barrow County, Georgia, sheriff’s investigator resigned and was arrested in a Flock camera misuse case after an internal audit flagged several suspicious searches the sheriff’s office attributes to her, made over about six months in the department’s license plate reader system. Investigator Stephanie Howard surrendered at the Barrow County Detention Center and was released on a $7,500 bond, according to a sheriff’s office news release as reported by Fox 5 Atlanta and WSB-TV.
She is charged with violation of oath by a public officer under O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1 and with violating § 35-1-22, the state’s license plate data law, Fox 5 reported. Both are accusations. Neither Fox 5’s nor WSB-TV’s report includes a statement from Howard or an attorney for her.
The sheriff’s office has not said how many searches were flagged, whose plates were looked up, whether any of the data was shared outside the agency, or whether the searches were connected to a case, according to Fox 5.
How the audit surfaced the searches
Sheriff Jud Smith ordered an internal investigation after the self-audit, the sheriff’s office said. That investigation turned up evidence of possible criminal violations, and the office asked the Georgia Bureau of Investigation for assistance.
Georgia’s statute requires an agency that runs a plate reader system to maintain policies for it and to train officers on them. The text I read does not require anyone to audit what officers search, and it exempts the captured plate data itself from the state Open Records Act. A driver whose plate was run for a personal reason therefore has no records request to file, and an agency’s willingness to audit itself is the main check on a single officer’s searches. Barrow County’s sheriff’s office ran the audit.
What the two charges carry
Section 35-1-22(d)(1) makes it a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature to knowingly request, use or obtain captured plate data under false pretenses or for any purpose other than a law enforcement purpose, and each violation counts as a separate offense. Under § 17-10-4, that level of misdemeanor carries up to 12 months in jail, a fine of up to $5,000, or both, for each offense. The felony is the oath charge, which carries one to five years. The sheriff’s office has not said how many counts Howard faces and I could not find the warrants, so those figures are the statutory ranges, not a forecast.
The same statute limits how long plate reads can sit in the system: no more than 30 months after collection, unless the data is tied to a toll violation or used for a law enforcement purpose. A plate captured this month could still be searchable in spring 2029 under that ceiling, depending on an agency’s own retention setting, which I could not find for Barrow County.
The sheriff’s July warning to camera vandals
In July, Sheriff Smith warned on social media that intentionally damaging the county’s Flock cameras is a felony and said his office was investigating three incidents of damage to county-owned cameras, according to WLHR’s reporting. Backfire News covered that warning in an earlier story. The post as reported cites no statute. Georgia’s interference with government property law, § 16-7-24(a), covers destroying, damaging or defacing government property and carries one to five years, the same range as the oath charge Howard faces.
On paper, then, the felony ranges match. The officer’s exposure can also stack, because each improper search under the plate data law is its own misdemeanor offense.
Georgia’s run of plate reader cases
Between July 6 and Oct. 19, the GBI announced arrests in at least 10 license plate reader misuse cases, covering at least 17 people, from five former Albany police officers to a former Vidalia police sergeant. That is Backfire News’s count from the titles of GBI press releases, not an official tally. It includes a Conyers case that Backfire News reported on earlier this year. I found no GBI release for the Barrow County case as of this writing.
The Savannah and Hall County releases follow the same sequence as Barrow’s. Savannah police asked the GBI to investigate on July 29 after an internal audit of their Flock system, and on Aug. 21 the GBI announced charges against four former employees, all for misuse of a license plate reader system and three also for violation of oath of office. Hall County’s sheriff’s office made its request on Aug. 18 after its own audit, and the GBI announced the arrest of a former investigator on Sept. 30. Both releases say preliminary information indicated the system was accessed for non-law enforcement purposes, and both describe the investigations as ongoing. The charges are allegations.
What comes next in Barrow County
The GBI is involved at the sheriff’s office’s request, and the reports I read give no court date. The question the sheriff’s office has not answered is whose plates were searched and why. Charging documents or court filings are where that detail would surface.
Should Georgia require outside audits of every agency’s plate reader searches, or is it enough to leave the checking to each sheriff and police chief?
About the Author
