Mark Ruffalo picked a fight with his own garage on August 5, and the loser wasn’t close. Quote-tweeting a story about a fresh federal investigation into Tesla’s suspension, the actor didn’t hedge: “I mean… they are not well made cars. Having tucked into a KIA EV now and having driven a Tesla. I have to say the Kia is hands down a better car and feels luxury compared to a Tesla.”
Ruffalo didn’t say which Kia he’s driving, but the timing of the post wasn’t random. He was reacting to coverage of a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration probe that had opened only a week earlier, and the details in that filing explain why an actor best known for playing the Hulk suddenly sounds like a suspension engineer.
On July 29, NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened Preliminary Evaluation PE26006, titled plainly “Lower Lateral Link Detachment.” The agency says it has fielded 156 complaints describing a front suspension failure in Model 3 sedans from the 2018-2020 and 2023 model years, plus Model Y crossovers built between 2021 and 2023. The part in question, the lower lateral link, is one of the control arms that locates the front wheel and keeps it pointed the right direction under load. When it separates from the knuckle or subframe, the agency’s own language is blunt about the result: a loss of vehicle directional control. In most cases, NHTSA notes, there was no advance warning that the failure would occur, and once it happens the car may not be drivable at all.
For anyone who hasn’t spent time underneath a car, a lateral link is deceptively simple: a single-purpose bar bolted between the subframe and the wheel hub that resists the sideways forces generated every time you turn, hit a pothole, or just drive straight on a crowned road. It carries no backup. If it lets go, that corner of the car loses its geometry entirely, and the wheel can tuck under or splay out with no warning. That is a different animal than a worn bushing degrading gradually over 80,000 miles. A fatigue crack in a lateral link, or a fastener that backs out, can turn an ordinary freeway merge into a very bad afternoon.
It’s worth being precise about what a Preliminary Evaluation actually is, because owners tend to hear “NHTSA investigation” and assume a recall is imminent. It isn’t, not yet. A PE is the opening step in the agency’s investigative pipeline, the phase where investigators are still trying to determine the underlying cause, scope, and severity of the potential problem. It can close with no action, escalate into a full Engineering Analysis, or eventually produce a recall demand, and that process routinely takes months. That same escalation ladder is currently playing out with Ford’s 1.0L EcoBoost timing belt, where a preliminary probe has already been upgraded to a full engineering analysis.
This isn’t Tesla’s first time dealing with this specific part, either. NHTSA’s filing notes two earlier campaigns tied to lateral link detachment: Recall 21V-835, covering 2,791 Model 3 vehicles from the 2019-2021 model years over a production issue, and Recall 23V-235, addressing 422 additional 2018-2019 Model 3s that had experienced similar failures. NHTSA explicitly states that the complaints behind PE26006 exceed the scope of those two campaigns and do not appear related to the same production defect, meaning investigators believe they may be looking at a broader or different failure mode spread across a much larger population of cars.
It’s the latest entry on a growing list of open Tesla safety business at NHTSA. The agency already forced a recall over Cybertruck wheels that could separate from the truck, is still sitting on a 3.2-million-car Autopilot investigation even after Tesla won a separate regulatory fight, and needed one rejected door handle complaint from a single owner to justify reshaping a federal rulemaking anyway. None of that is speculation. It’s a pattern of an automaker whose production choices and complaint volume keep its file cabinet in Washington unusually busy, and Ruffalo happened to be reading the mail.
Ruffalo has been driving and publicly discussing Teslas for years, which is part of what makes this post land differently than a typical celebrity gripe. When a longtime customer says a competitor’s product “feels luxury” by comparison, that’s a brand-perception problem money can’t easily buy back. Kia has spent the last several years positioning its EV lineup as exactly that alternative: real interior quality and a warranty that backs it up, at price points that undercut Tesla’s equivalent models. Corporate sibling Hyundai just made the same pitch from a different angle, cutting the price of the IONIQ 5 N while adding access to the Tesla-built charging network that used to be one of Tesla’s biggest advantages.
If you’re driving an affected Model 3 or Model Y, the practical advice is unglamorous but straightforward: pay attention to clunks, knocks, or looseness from the front end, especially over rough pavement, since several complaints on file cite noise before the failure occurred. An open Preliminary Evaluation isn’t a recall and doesn’t trigger a mandatory dealer fix, so no notice is coming yet, but you can check your VIN against NHTSA’s database directly, and it’s worth doing before a long trip rather than after a noise you’ve been talking yourself out of. Owners who’d rather not wait for chapter two can ask a Tesla service center to inspect the front suspension hardware even without an active recall campaign attached to it.
Whether PE26006 turns into a formal recall or closes with no action, Ruffalo’s post already did something a federal filing never could: it put “Tesla suspension” in front of millions of feeds in a single afternoon. That’s the modern recall cycle in miniature, an actor’s phone managing more first-day reach than most manufacturer safety notices ever get.
About the Author
