Image via Greg Biffle/Facebook
The wrongful death case tied to the December 18 crash that killed Greg Biffle, his wife, both of their kids, family friend Craig Wadsworth, and pilot Dennis Dutton and his son Jack just picked up a defendant with a name on the aircraft’s paperwork instead of just a name on an obituary. Margaret Stephanie Dutton, Dennis Dutton’s widow and Jack’s mother, filed a wrongful death suit this week in Iredell County Superior Court against GB Aviation Leasing LLC, the company that actually owned and operated the Cessna Citation 550, and against Jordyn Biffle Carpenter, the administrator handling Greg Biffle’s estate.
That’s a different kind of target than what’s already been fought over in the dueling $25 million estate lawsuits that broke out earlier this year. Those cases argue about who was making decisions in the cockpit during the final minutes of the flight. This new complaint skips the cockpit argument almost entirely and goes after the condition of the airplane itself, seeking compensatory damages on the theory that GB Aviation Leasing never made sure the jet was airworthy and never ran adequate safety checks before it left the ramp.
What the NTSB Already Found on the Ramp
The National Transportation Safety Board’s preliminary report on the crash, released in late January, is where that theory finds its footing. Before N257BW ever took the runway, cockpit voice recordings show Dutton and two pilot-rated passengers discussing an inoperative thrust reverser indicator light on one of the two engines. They decided the reverser itself worked fine and pushed the throttles up anyway. Seconds into the takeoff roll, a passenger in the back noted the left engine seemed to be making more power than the right and guessed it was a bad gauge. Nobody aborted.
Six minutes later the airplane was gone. The pilot lost confidence in his own altitude indicator and other instruments on his side of the panel, the autopilot dropped offline, and radio calls to air traffic control to activate the instrument flight plan kept failing. Control briefly passed to the right seat, then apparently back to Dutton once the crew could see the ground again. Landing gear was selected down, but the indicator lights never illuminated. At 10:13:48 a.m., someone on board radioed the airport’s common frequency: “we’re having some issues here.” Two minutes later the jet clipped an approach light stand about 1,380 feet short of runway 28, sheared through trees, and came to rest in flames just short of the threshold. Investigators found no evidence of a structural failure or an uncontained engine failure. Both engines were still bolted to their pylons and both thrust reversers were stowed, not deployed.
Why Suing the Leasing Company Changes the Fight
Aircraft owners almost never hold title to a jet in their own name. They register it to a single-purpose LLC instead, which is exactly what GB Aviation Leasing LLC appears to be for Biffle. It’s a standard move for tax and liability reasons, and it usually works the way it’s supposed to: it keeps a mechanical problem with the plane from automatically becoming a personal problem for the owner. What it doesn’t do is make the LLC immune from being sued directly, and under FAA Part 91, the duty to keep an aircraft airworthy sits with the operator, not with whoever happens to be flying it that day. That’s the opening this complaint is aimed at. Instead of relitigating who was in the pilot’s seat when things went sideways, it argues the sideways part started on the ground, before engine start, when a known discrepancy didn’t stop the flight.
The Detail That Complicates Everything
There’s a wrinkle here that hasn’t gotten much attention, and it cuts in more than one direction. Dutton held type ratings in everything from the A320 to the DC-10, but his CE-500 rating, the one covering this specific jet, carried a limitation requiring a qualified second-in-command. The passenger in the right seat that day was his own son, holding only a private pilot certificate, and the NTSB report states plainly that he wasn’t qualified to serve as second-in-command under federal aviation regulations. In plain terms, by the FAA’s own paperwork, this airplane may not have been legally crewed to begin with. That fact doesn’t do the new lawsuit against GB Aviation Leasing any favors, since a jury could just as easily read it as a crewing decision rather than a maintenance failure, but it does explain why attorneys on all sides of this litigation are picking their legal theories carefully instead of throwing every possible claim at every possible defendant.
It’s also worth knowing that the NTSB’s own findings can’t simply be read into a civil trial. Federal law blocks the Board’s analysis and probable-cause conclusions from being used as evidence in lawsuits stemming from the same accident, specifically so litigation doesn’t turn into a rubber stamp of a federal safety investigation. Factual material, like cockpit voice recordings, maintenance logs, and radar tracks, is generally fair game. That’s why a preliminary report that officially settles nothing is already showing up, sentence by sentence, in competing legal filings more than a year before the NTSB issues a final probable cause.
What Owners and Insurers Are Watching
For anyone who owns or is shopping for a jet held inside a leasing LLC, this case is a reminder that the corporate wrapper protects personal assets, not the entity’s own exposure. Multiple wrongful death claims arising from one crash typically draw against the same aviation liability policy, and once combined settlements or judgments start approaching that policy’s limits, later-filed claims like this one can end up racing earlier ones to the same pool of money. That dynamic alone tends to push these cases toward settlement long before a courtroom ever sees a verdict, regardless of how the underlying facts eventually shake out.
The NTSB isn’t expected to issue a final report with an official probable cause for another year or more. Civil court doesn’t have that kind of patience, and with a widow now suing the company that owned the plane her husband and son died in, this case is no longer just about what happened in a cockpit over Statesville. It’s about who was supposed to make sure that cockpit worked in the first place.
About the Author
